Comments - Anything you post can be used or changed by the site owner (i.e. your comments can and will be changed at will if the site owner deems it necessary due to language, name calling, etc.)
I've gotten tons of email asking me if I drew this cartoon. It seems lots of people see it posted in other blog sites with a reference to Scotland as the place it was drawn. The answer is that YES, I am the one that drew this cartoon with a special thank you for the pun going to my son.
I realized that I didn't really specify where I am from, so here is the updated comment:
I've gotten tons of email asking me if I drew this cartoon. It seems lots of people see it posted in other blog sites with a reference to Scotland as the place it was drawn. The answer is that YES (I am from the United States) and I am the one that drew this cartoon (in the United States) with a special thank you for the pun going to my son.
President Obama kills Newborns.. I am pretty sure that would have been on the news somewhere, even if it was that crap on fox news that passes itself off as news.
MORE AND MORE LIES FROM OBAMA THAT CNN & msnbc HIDE FOR VOTERS
Obama and the Born-Alive Act [Yuval Levin]
Six years ago, Congress passed the "Born-Alive Infants Protection Act,"making it illegal to kill a child who is fully born during an attempted abortion. The bill passed without a single opposing vote in either house, and was signed into law by President Bush on August 5, 2002. When he was a state senator at that same time, Barack Obama opposed a state version of the bill in Illinois. His explanation for the vote since then has been that the state version did not include a so-called "neutrality clause" which says explicitly that the bill is not meant to influence
the legal standing of a fetus before birth one way or another. The federal law contained such a clause, and the state law, Obama has long insisted, did not. As recently as June 30, the Obama campaign made that case to answer the charge (in that case from Bill Bennett) that Obama had opposed the Born-Alive Act.
But now, the National Right to Life Committee has uncovered proof that Obama in fact voted in committee against even the version of the Illinois Born-Alive Act that did include exactly the same "neutrality clause" as the federal bill. On March 12, 2003, when the bill was being debated, an amendment was added that inserted the neutrality language of the federal bill verbatim into the Illinois bill. Obama voted for the amendment (that's the vote on the left-hand column on this committee vote record), and then voted against the amended bill (that's the vote on the right on the same document). All the Democrats on the committee (which Obama chaired) followed his lead, and the bill was defeated.
This was, again, legislation that in the same form had by then passed unanimously at the federal level. Even NARAL did not oppose it. Apparently Barack Obama did, and his old explanation for doing so seems
at odds with the facts.
Comments - Anything you post can be used or changed by the site owner (i.e. your comments can and will be changed at will if the site owner deems it necessary due to language, name calling, etc.)
Where did this cartoon originate
Anti-Septic from Scotland
Is it correct or not that this originated in Scotland?
When I went back and read my initial comment:
I've gotten tons of email asking me if I drew this cartoon. It seems lots of people see it posted in other blog sites with a reference to Scotland as the place it was drawn. The answer is that YES (I am from the United States) and I am the one that drew this cartoon (in the United States) with a special thank you for the pun going to my son.
Warning Label
" Rated #1 birth control. Kills all undesired new born infants.
Ah, yes. But to Obama the
Ah, yes. But to Obama the unborn are mistakes..... not lives.
warning label??
President Obama kills Newborns.. I am pretty sure that would have been on the news somewhere, even if it was that crap on fox news that passes itself off as news.
Uh, yeah...
It has been on the news, but you probably wrote the report of as the racist rantings of a right wing nut job.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28089
Obamas Abortion Record
http://www.mcclpac.org/about_obama_baipa.htm
Educate yourself. Know the facts. How can you defend the indefensible and a man who supports the indefensible?
Obama and the Born-Alive Act [Yuval Levin]
MORE AND MORE LIES FROM OBAMA THAT CNN & msnbc HIDE FOR VOTERS
Obama and the Born-Alive Act [Yuval Levin]
Six years ago, Congress passed the "Born-Alive Infants Protection Act,"making it illegal to kill a child who is fully born during an attempted abortion. The bill passed without a single opposing vote in either house, and was signed into law by President Bush on August 5, 2002. When he was a state senator at that same time, Barack Obama opposed a state version of the bill in Illinois. His explanation for the vote since then has been that the state version did not include a so-called "neutrality clause" which says explicitly that the bill is not meant to influence
the legal standing of a fetus before birth one way or another. The federal law contained such a clause, and the state law, Obama has long insisted, did not. As recently as June 30, the Obama campaign made that case to answer the charge (in that case from Bill Bennett) that Obama had opposed the Born-Alive Act.
But now, the National Right to Life Committee has uncovered proof that Obama in fact voted in committee against even the version of the Illinois Born-Alive Act that did include exactly the same "neutrality clause" as the federal bill. On March 12, 2003, when the bill was being debated, an amendment was added that inserted the neutrality language of the federal bill verbatim into the Illinois bill. Obama voted for the amendment (that's the vote on the left-hand column on this committee vote record), and then voted against the amended bill (that's the vote on the right on the same document). All the Democrats on the committee (which Obama chaired) followed his lead, and the bill was defeated.
This was, again, legislation that in the same form had by then passed unanimously at the federal level. Even NARAL did not oppose it. Apparently Barack Obama did, and his old explanation for doing so seems
at odds with the facts.
Aug 19, 2008 @ 09:14 AM
Lacey, PA
SIDE EFFECTS: Marxism
Do not forget that the outcome from taking this is Marxism.
it's the desired 'side
it's the desired 'side effects' that makes it potent. no prescription needed.
Nice
Very nice Desene online
Cute cartoon. Not sure if
Cute cartoon. Not sure if posting the source is allowed, but I posted it anyway. It is really funny.
I hope the new health plan
I hope the new health plan covers this panacea.